Tag Archives: C

SHEEP IN THE BOX

Producers: Kaoru Matsuzaki and Megumi Banse   Director: Hirokazu Kore-eda    Screenplay: Hirokazu Kore-eda   Cast: Haruka Ayase, Daigo Yamamoto, Rimu Kuwaki, Kimiko Yo, Nana Seino, Kan’ichirô Satô, Akhiro Kakuta, Kayu Noro, Hinata Hiiragi, Min Tanaka, Mari Hoshino and Ayumu Nakajira    Distributor: Neon

Grade: C

The best of Hirokazu Kore-eda’s previous films have been so uncommonly moving that “Sheep in the Box” proves an especial disappointment.  At a time when stories about artificial intelligence mostly emphasize its menacing potential, however, this more benign take on the possibilities it offers for AI-based robotics is at least different—although, if you speculate beyond its apparently comforting conclusion, you might feel a gnawing sense of danger lurking down the line.

Kore-eda’s script revolves, as the title derived from an episode in Antoine de Saint-Exupéry’s “The Little Prince” indicates, around the power of imagination; the sequence is about envisioning a sheep hidden in a box rather than viewing one explicitly illustrated for you.  In this case the individual imagining something—seeing what is invisible to the eye—might be human, but could conceivably instead be a robotic humanoid.

Set in what’s referred to as the near future, the film is initially a tale of grief—that of architect Otone Komoto (Haruka Ayase) and her husband Kensuke (Daigo Yamamoto), a master carpenter, whose young son Kakeru was killed in a hit-and-run two years previously.  Otone is home alone, working on an assignment to design a large, modern house for the Hanos, Junichi (Akihiro Kakuta) and Kasumi (Kayo Noro), when a drone delivery box arrives, containing a holographic invitation to visit the office of REbirth, a company that provides humanoid replicas of departed loved ones.  Kensuke is reluctant to go, but Otone insists, and they agree to accept a humanoid Kakeru (Rimu Kuwaki), at least on a trial basis.

Their new quasi-son is at first a blank slate able only to say “I’m home, Mama.”  He’s also unlike a human boy.  He doesn’t sleep, recharging at night while sitting in a chair.  He must be kept from getting wet.  He’s equipped with a switch that prevents his wandering from proximity with the Komotos.  And, of course, he won’t age.

Otone is more accepting of the replacement than Kensuke, who dismisses it as just a machine that he refuses to allow calling him Daddy and, at first, chooses not to have much contact with, though he gradually relents.  It’s eventually revealed that both are suffering from guilt as well as grief, since each blames himself for failing to pick up the boy from school on the day he was killed walking home.  

Meanwhile Kakeru, in his quiet, methodical way, is trying to learn to be not just a boy but this particular boy.  In the process, however, he grows aware of what makes him different from human children.  He develops a connection with trees, which some believe to have souls, though the engineers at REbirth reject the notion that their humanoids have one.  And he joins with an older humanoid, Gen Hidaka (Kan’ichirô Satô), who is assembling a cohort of the robots, many of them abused by their owners, in a project to create a community of their own.  Hidaka removes the switches preventing their venturing away from their “parents” and has them working in secret to achieve their goal.  (This plot thread is connected with another involving reports of missing children and suspicions about a serial kidnapper.)

Despite the secrecy of this humanoid group, however, the tone of “Sheep in the Box” remains gentle, unhurried and ruminative—so much so, in fact, that it grows tedious despite its vaguely futuristic atmosphere (the production design is by Tayuka Okada, and there are some modest effects supervised by Soichi Umezawa and Tetsuya Shiraisi, as well as a rather rudimentary design for the inner workings of the robot by Kouji Tajima). Kore-eda accentuates the lapidary mood not only through his deliberate pacing but his solemn editing, and Ryuto Kondo’s stately cinematography and Yuta Bandoh’s muted score add to it.     

There are, however, a few points where things perk up slightly.  In one sequence, Kensuke uses Kakeru in an attempt to jump-start the investigation into his son’s accident, with unfortunate results involving the police (based in large measure on his refusal to let the humanoid call him Papa).  And when Otone’s sharp-tongued mother Nobuyo (Kimiko Yo) shows up unexpectedly and berates her daughter for adopting a humanoid replacement for her dead son rather than having another child, the dramatic pulse quickens.

But even Nobuyo is swept up in the film’s final act, in which the Komotos join in Hidaka’s plan and help his group, including Kakeru, move to an isolated forest locale.  There Kakeru immediately embraces a huge tree, communing with its soul—just as he had embraced a tree in Otone’s patio which had been planted in her dead son’s memory.  The inference that Kakeru, and the other humanoids, have souls despite their makers’ denials, is inescapable.  And it’s hardly meaningless that the house Otone is designing for the Hanos gets the approval of all after much haggling only when she installs a tree in the middle of her elaborate model. 

Thus the soul is, like the sheep of the fable, an unseen entity that can be imagined—and the humanoid Kakeru is doing so by communing with those of trees, including the one in the Komodo home.  The implication that humanoids possess souls as well seems clear.

Of course, that can be read as either comforting or, if one sees it as an indication that AI robots might develop as rivals to humans, threatening.  “Sheep in the Box” raises provocative questions about the future, but its almost deadeningly placid surface and soft characterizations make it an imperfect vehicle for them, though the cast and crew clearly give their all in support of Kore-eda’s vision, with Kuwaki particularly impressive as the humanoid at the center of things.     

READING LOLITA IN TEHRAN

Producers: Gianluca Curti, Moshe Edery, Eran Riklis, Michael Sharfstein, Marica Stocchi and Santo Versace   Director: Eran Riklis    Screenplay: Marjorie David   Cast: Golshifteh Farahani, Zar Amir Ebrahimi, Mina Kavani, Reza Diako, Arash Marandi, Lara Wolf, Raha Rahbari, Shahbaz Noshir, Catayoune Ahmadi, Sina Parvaneh and Hamid Karimi   Distributor: Greenwich Entertainment

Grade: C

Azar Nafisi’s memoir about intellectual oppression and the subjection of women in the Islamic Republic of Iran during the nearly two decades between 1979 and 1997 was rapturously received when it was published in 2003, after she and her family had relocated to the United States.  It told, from a personal point of view, a story of quiet resistance to brutal repression that profoundly resonated with readers at the time and continues to do so down to the present, conditions in Iran being as they still are.

It would be wonderful to report that Eran Riklis’ adaptation of the book carried similar power.  Unfortunately, it doesn’t, being workmanlike rather than inspired—the sort of engaged but pedestrian treatment one might have expected Stanley Kramer to have brought to such material back in the day.  “Reading Lolita in Tehran” is earnest but, as filmmaking, rather stolid and, dare one say it, dull in spite of the power of the story it tells. 

Like many of Kramer’s films, however, it is at least blessed with some fine performances.  Golshifteh Farahani draws an excellent balance between a general attitude of controlled reticence and occasional bursts of intense emotion as Nafisi, who’s introduced returning to her homeland in 1979.  Buoyed by the hope that the revolution will usher in a new age of freedom in Iran, she’s given up an academic career in the West to teach English literature at the University of Tehran.

But unlike her husband Bijan (Arash Marandi), whose engineering career prospers under the new regime, Azar finds herself increasingly hemmed in as her efforts to broaden the minds of students, both male and female, are circumscribed.  She encounters difficulties early on when some students in her class criticize “The Great Gatsby” as immoral and, at the suggestion of Bahri (Reza Diako), a pious but respectful young man, even put Fitzgerald’s book on trial as inimical to Islamic practice.

As the years go on, the situation deteriorates.  When religious agitators protest at the university and are met by students, government forces that arrive ostensibly to restore order beat the students mercilessly and cart some off for interrogation and torture.   By the time the class discusses Henry James’s “Daisy Miller,” condemnation of the book’s heroine is immediate and almost universal.  Legislation mandating all women to wear the hajib leads Azar to a confrontation with a university guard.  A screening of Andrei Tarkovsky’s 1986 film “The Sacrifice” makes the crudity of state censorship abundantly clear.  Finally, Nafisi feels it futile to continue and resigns her position.

She does not cease teaching, however, holding weekly book discussions with some of her former students at her home.  (The film, it should be noted, toys with the chronology, though the purpose behind doing so isn’t clear.)  It’s during these mid-nineties discussions on Nabokov’s “Lolita” and Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice” that the women’s understanding of their position in Iranian society is more fully and despairingly discussed and details of their treatment revealed.  One attendee has been slapped by her husband for coming.  Another describes her forced examination when she was suspected of sexual impropriety and her subsequent whipping.  A third discloses that student demonstrators underwent so-called interrogations that amounted to rape.  Finally, a participant reveals her decision to be smuggled to Turkey, where her brother-in-law will be waiting to take her to England.

All of this eats away at Azar, who loses faith in improvement in Iran despite her love of the country and the success of Bijan, who counsels patience.  The result of young men like Bahri returning from the war with Iraq severely injured both physically and psychologically is particularly devastating, especially after one of them, Ghomi (Hamid Karimi) commits suicide in a public, and gruesome, way.

About Azar’s only consolation is her occasional conversation with an unnamed intellectual (Shahbaz Noshir), an older professor who survives by avoiding confrontation but continues to assure her of the power of literature.  One of the most poignant episodes, effective precisely because of its understatement, comes as they sit in the square outside the shuttered store where both used to buy English-language books.  She recalls in flashback the vibrant atmosphere that prevailed there, and he gifts her with his own copy of Nabokov’s memoir “Speak, Memory,” a extremely rare item in Iran.  Though the film doesn’t explicitly make the point, it’s a volume by the émigré author which mirrors the acute sense of displacement and loss that Nafisi has come to feel.

This is obviously a story of wrenching power, and one wishes that Riklis’ film did it justice.  But despite the efforts of a committed cast, especially the luminous Farahani, of a crew (production designer Tonino Zera, costumer Maria Luisa Montalto and cinematographer Hélène Louvart) to give the Italian settings a sense of verisimilitude, and of editor Arik Lahav-Leibovich and composer Jonathan Riklis to endow it with underlying energy, it comes up short.