Producers: Marc Platt and Adam Siegel Director: Dean DeBlois Screenplay: Dean DeBlois, William Davies, Chris Sanders and Cressida Cowell Cast: Mason Thames, Nico Parker, Gabriel Howell, Julian Dennison, Bronwyn James, Harry Trevaldwyn, Peter Serafinowicz, Nick Frost and Gerard Butler Distributor: Universal Pictures
Grade: C+
The lamentable practice of remaking popular animated movies in live-action—or, more accurately, hybrid live-action/animated—form has largely been a Disney phenomenon, but it’s spreading. Case in point: DreamWorks’ redo of their good-natured 2010 boy-and-his-dog (sorry, dragon) adventure, a tale obviously inspired by Androcles and the Lion but embellished with scads of action. The new “How to Train Your Dragon” isn’t terrible, and will probably find a large audience among those who’ve become fans of a franchise that’s grown to include sequels and TV series; but it’s a distant also-ran in comparison to the original.
Writer-director Dean DeBlois, who’s been shepherding the property on the big screen since he and Chris Sanders co-wrote and co-directed the first adaptation of Cressida Cowell’s 2003 book, is clearly protective of his initial effort. This “Dragon” is almost slavishly indebted to the 2010 movie, following its arc religiously, including ample amounts of its dialogue and framing most the images after the model of the animated version. But he elongates some sequences, italicizing messages in the process, and the switch to live-action necessarily slows the expository stuff down considerably. The result is that the new telling of the same story is much longer (123 minutes as opposed to 97), draggier and far more ponderous.
Moreover, the switch from animation to live action darkens and bloats cinematographer Bill Pope’s visuals. That’s evident in the flying sequences, which in the original had a colorful grandeur and sense of sheer fun lacking here. It might seem progress to set the animated dragon whooshing along, with a now-human rider on an improvised saddle, against realistic backdrops shot, presumably by helicopter and then speeded up. But in practice the result looks blurred and murky, more hectic than enthralling.
Then there’s the final battle with the huge queen dinosaur, in which Hiccup’s friendship with Toothless, which goes against the grain of his community’s kill-the-dragons lifestyle, is vindicated. As edited by Wyatt Smith, it’s more protracted here, presumably to show off the effects, and the monster dino is gargantuan. But the size of the sequence actually works against it, since it lacks the clarity and precision of the animated equivalent and comes to feel like overkill, especially with John Powell’s score blaring in the background. (Powell, too, is a returnee from the 2010 film.) The uplift of the epilogue, accentuated by the “awesome” tones Powell has contrived for the flying scenes, is still there, but that’s because it basically repeats what the 2010 movie did verbatim.
In its favor, though, the plot does retain its worthwhile messages about being true to yourself, bonding with others (including critters) and joining together in a common purpose. Mason Thames is a nicely awkward Hiccup, and plays his scenes with the computer-generated dragon Toothless (not quite as cute this time around) as well as can be expected, as well as those with humans like his father Stoick (Gerard Butler, now seen in hirsute bulk as well as heard in stentorian voice), chatty blacksmith/mentor Gobber (genial Nick Frost), ambitious rival and eventual love interest Astrid (Nice Parker, nicely managing the transition from surly competitor to stalwart partner) and his fellow trainees Fishlegs (Julian Dennison), Snotlout (Gabriel Howell), Ruffnut (Bronwyn James) and Tuffnut (Harry Trevaldwyn). All the actors, old and young, happily inhabit the Viking world meticulously crafted by production designer Dominic Watkins and costumer Lindsay Pugh and strive mightily to emulate the gestures and inflections of the animated figures that preceded them.
So the question is whether we really needed a live-action/animated movie that essentially replicates a fully animated one that’s only fifteen years old, while dragging it out and darkening it down. The answer is no, of course, but DeBlois’ commitment to be true to his original vision can be admired, even if you consider the project itself misguided and the realization ultimately disappointing.