All posts by One Guys Opinion

Dr. Frank Swietek is Associate Professor of History at the University of Dallas, where he is regarded as a particularly tough grader. He has been the film critic of the University News since 1988, and has discussed movies on air at KRLD-AM (Dallas) and KOMO-AM (Seattle). He is also the Founding President of the Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics' Association, a group of print and broadcast journalists covering film in the Metroplex area, and was a charter member of the Society of Texas Film Critics. Dr. Swietek is a member of the Online Film Critics Society (OFCS). He was instrumental in the creation of the Lone Star Awards, which, through the efforts of the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Film Commission, give recognition annually to the best feature films and television programs produced in Texas.

THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE TWO TOWERS

A

Anyone who was entranced by “The Fellowship of the Ring,” the initial installment of Peter Jackson’s adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkein’s much-admired trilogy, and who might be apprehensive about whether the second film will measure up to its predecessor, can breathe a sigh of relief. “The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers” is a majestic achievement, an epic of astonishing grandeur and surprising emotional depth; meeting, even exceeding, expectations, it’s the best sequel since “The Empire Strikes Back.”

Like that second “Star Wars” film, this one is, in many respects, an improvement on the first. While it can’t recapture the sense of freshness and innocence that “Fellowship” possessed, it makes up for the loss by being smoother, less episodic and on an even more massive scale. Opening in medias res, without wasting time recapitulating the previous episode, it also resembles “Empire” in its exquisite juggling of different plot strands as it follows various groups of characters along their separate routes. Most important to the ultimate outcome of Tolkien’s tale, of course, are Frodo (Elijah Wood) and Sam (Sean Astin), who continue their journey toward Modor to destroy the titular ring to keep it from the grasp of the evil wizard Saruman (Christopher Lee); along the way they become involved with the emaciated, Uriah Heepish creature Gollum (performed by Andy Serkis and then radically transformed in appearance by special effects) and eventually with the head of Gondor’s forces, Faramir (David Wenham), who believes that the ring could give him the power to withstand the forces threatening his realm. Meanwhile the other pair of hobbits, Merry (Dominic Monaghan) and Pippin (Billy Boyd), escape from a hostile army into an enchanted forest, where they’re literally taken up by Treebeard (voiced by John Rhys-Davies), a huge, lumbering “tree shepherd” who (which?), along with his equally mobile colleagues, must decide whether to take part in the war over Middle Earth. Third, there’s the courageous trio of Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and Gimli (John Rhys-Davies again), who travel to the realm of Rohan to aid King Theoden (Bernard Hill) and his beauteous niece Eowyn (Miranda Otto) against Saruman’s serpentine henchman Wormtongue (Brad Dourif) and the wizard’s enormous army–an effort that takes them all to the vast fortress of Helm’s Deep. Eowyn, one notes, takes a distinct interest in Aragorn, though he constantly recollects his feelings for the absent Arwen (Liv Tyler). And lastly Gandalf (Ian McKellen) returns, transformed from grey to white as a result of the battle in which he’d apparently died in episode one, to assist various of the heroes at critical junctures.

With this wealth of characters and incident, it’s amazing that Jackson, along with co-writers Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens and Stephen Sinclair and aided by superlative editing from Michael Horton and Jabez Olssen, keeps all the plot threads so wonderfully clear and the interrelationships so effectively drawn. He manages to give the film spectacular breadth while moving the story along briskly, and his handling of the big combat sequences seems more assured than in the previous film. A good deal of the credit must also be directed toward the large design team, which has fashioned some very evocative sets and costumes, and the even larger effects crew, which not only works wonders in the huge battles which make up much of the picture’s final act but has manufactured a slew of memorable creatures as well. Treebeard and his companions are witty and strangely haunting entities, for example, and flying dragons and gruesome buffalo-like beasts, as well as the grim enemy soldiers who use them as steeds, are also imaginatively rendered. The masterpiece, though, is surely Gollum, who looks like a cadaverous version of Peter Lorre, with huge, bulging eyes, scraps of stringy hair and a sallow, grey complexion. He also turns out to be suffering from multiple personality disorder, and occasionally has debates with himself–switching between the duplicitous schemer who prattles on about recovering “my precious,” as he calls the ring that’s reduced him to his present state, and the frightened, obsequious servant who pledges his loyalty to Frodo in his quest. (It’s the same device that Emily Watson employed in “Breaking the Waves,” but here it works far better, because it’s meant to be grimly humorous.) Gollum, quite simply, succeeds where George Lucas’ attempts to fashion viable CGI characters have so miserably failed (Jar Jar Binks being the most obvious example); he (it?) proves conclusively that a computer-generated figure can possess the same sort of emotional impact that traditional animated ones have often had in the past. There’s also a good deal of wit in his portrayal: watch for the moment when, grabbing the sides of his head with his hands in a fit of terror, he looks almost exactly like the famous image in Edvard Munch’s “The Scream.”

Compared to Gollum, even McKellen as the transfigured Gandalf seems a bit ordinary, but he again brings a welcome measure of Guinness-like (or Obi Wan-like) gravity to the good wizard, just as Lee once more invests Saruman with his patented silken malice, even if the role has been considerably trimmed from the last installment. Mortensen and Bloom carry themselves as heroically as ever, and Rhys-Davies injects much of the humor in the piece (apart from the darker smiles associated with Gollum) in his twin roles as the vertically-impaired Gimli and the oracular Treebeard. Wood and Astin make a good pair, even if their roles here are less central to the action than one might expect (the episodes in which they’re involved are uniformly dark and bleak in tone, as well), and Boyd and Monaghan still cut pleasantly leprechaun-like figures. On the distaff side, only Otto has much opportunity to make an impression, and she’s fine; Tyler and Cate Blanchett, as Galadriel, are reduced to little more than cameos. Less successful are the Rohan duo of Hill and Dourif, the former never quite filling the monarch’s legendary boots and the latter oozing a bit too much oily villainy of the kind he’s peddled in all too many direct-to-video titles. On the other hand, Wenham cuts a fine figure as the ambiguous hero of Gondor.

Topping everything off is the sumptuous cinematography of Andrew Lesnie, which captures the New Zealand locales to often breathtaking effect, and Howard Shore’s rousing score, which underlines the action splendidly without getting intrusive about it.

“The Two Towers” also resembles “The Empire Strikes Back,” of course, in ending without a full resolution, and it doesn’t boast the sort of startling revelation that gave the close of Irvin Kirshner’s film such punch. But Jackson has once more done Tolkien’s original up so well that the only disappointment most viewers will be feeling, even after 179 minutes (which, admittedly, don’t seem anywhere near that long), is that they have to wait twelve months for the next helping.

INTACTO (INTACT)

C

Juan Carlos Fresnadillo’s “Intacto” is being Englished as “Intact,” but “Untouched” would probably be a more accurate and meaningful translation. It’s a very stylish but ultimately extremely silly tale, in the fashion of recent mysterious and enigmatic Spanish outings like “Open Your Eyes” and “Sex and Lucia,” about luck and destiny. The premise of the piece, which the director penned with Andres Koppel, is that good fortune is not only something associated with certain individuals, but that it can in fact be “stolen” from them by others; and that, furthermore, those who possess it have contests with one another to find which of them has the greater gift–games played at very high stakes.

We’re introduced to this peculiar notion in connection with a grave, older man named Samuel (Max Von Sydow, playing the part with all the weight his age and experience naturally bestow on him). Samuel lives in the sterile catacombs connected with a casino on an island off the Spanish coast, where he apparently has something to do with controlling the establishment’s winnings and losses (the script isn’t terribly clear on this point). But he has a falling-out with a protégé named Federico (Eusebio Poncela), from whom he takes his good luck and whom he then exiles to the larger world. Focused on revenge, Federico seeks out another lucky soul whom he can prep for a showdown with Sam, and after years of searching decides on Tomas (Leonardo Sbaraglia), a bank robber who’s been captured by the cops only after he’s miraculously survived a catastrophic plane crash (shakes of “Unbreakable” may pass through the viewer’s memory here). Federico springs him from hospital confinement and leads him to a series of encounters with a bullfighter named Alejandro (Antonio Dechent) and Sara (Monica :Lopez), a policewoman, both of whom apparently also have the gift, before a rather rambunctious, imperfectly staged denouement in Samuel’s lair.

Fresnadillo plays all of this out with considerable technical skill–the compositions in “Intacto” are frequently striking (Xavier Jimenez’s cinematography is excellent), and the suggestions of violence and loss of power are often subtly unsettling. (A sequence in which blindfolded competitors run through a dense forest to determine which will be the last to collide with a tree has a good mixture of suspense and excitement.) But while the material that’s confined to Federico, Tomas and Alejandro has a certain engaging spookiness, other parts of the picture are less satisfactory. The elements centering on Sara are never successfully integrated into the plot, and her involvement at the close takes the plot to the point of absurdity. Even worse is the background matter on Samuel. The old man, it turns out, is a survivor of the Holocaust, where his luck was, it seems, first exhibited in a particularly hideous way; and his grimness and sense of fatalism derive from the experience. Simply put, using a genocidal part of history as an easy referent in what amounts to a potboiler thriller is more than a bit tasteless, even if Von Sydow’s solemnity nearly makes it work in dramatic terms. Otherwise the performances are mostly workmanlike, though Sbaraglia shows the charisma that could lead to bigger things.

“Intacto” is a slick piece of nonsense but nothing more, and its Holocaust references make it slightly unpleasant as well. Ultimately it’s the sort of picture that’s best described as promising, but not quite there yet.