All posts by One Guys Opinion

Dr. Frank Swietek is Associate Professor of History at the University of Dallas, where he is regarded as a particularly tough grader. He has been the film critic of the University News since 1988, and has discussed movies on air at KRLD-AM (Dallas) and KOMO-AM (Seattle). He is also the Founding President of the Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics' Association, a group of print and broadcast journalists covering film in the Metroplex area, and was a charter member of the Society of Texas Film Critics. Dr. Swietek is a member of the Online Film Critics Society (OFCS). He was instrumental in the creation of the Lone Star Awards, which, through the efforts of the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Film Commission, give recognition annually to the best feature films and television programs produced in Texas.

CONFESSIONS OF A DANGEROUS MIND

Grade: C-

Charlie Kaufman is certainly the flavor of the month; nearly everyone–though not yours truly–has been singing his praises for the puerile, self-referential reworking of Susan Orlean’s “The Orchid Thief” he did for Spike Jonze in “Adaptation.” Now equal numbers of folks will probably laud him for this adaptation of Chuck Barris’ whimsically misleading autobiography. Kaufman’s work here is more mundane than it was for Jonze–he hasn’t deconstructed Barris’ tale, woven himself into it and tried to turn it into some existentialist prank; his script, in fact, is pretty faithful to the tone of the book, though it necessarily takes some liberties. In this case, however, that’s not much cause for praise, because Barris’ tome–like much of Kaufman’s work–was already self-consciously quirky and sophomoric, melding a semblance of history with lunatic falsehood in a way that the screenwriter must have found irresistible. His treatment merely highlights the peculiarities of the original, and George Clooney, in his directorial debut, then showcases the stranger elements all the more by employing every off-the-wall cinematic device within reach. He seems to have found the production equipment the biggest electric train set any boy ever had, as Orson Welles famously put it when he was making “Citizen Kane.” But “Confessions of a Dangerous Mind” is no “Kane.” It’s neither revelatory nor truly edgy–merely crassly flamboyant and comedically labored.

Barris, of course, was one of the true oddities of 1960s-1970s television, the carnival-barker producer who took game and so-called “variety” shows as low as they could get, and made a mint from the result. Beginning with “The Dating Game” in 1966 and continuing through “The Newlywed Game” and the infamous “Gong Show,” which he hosted himself (with perpetually squinting eyes and tone-dead delivery), he delivered a succession of programs predicated on a constant flow of innuendo and humiliation; anyone with even the slightest claim to sophistication watched them as a guilty secret, if at all. The string of successes–and Barris’ career–ended when “Gong” and his only other surviving effort, “The $1.98 Beauty Show,” were booted out of syndication in 1980. A couple of years later he penned the book on which Clooney’s movie is based, in which he melded the story of his early life and TV career, told with typical razzmatazz, with a fanciful tale of his concomitant activity as a CIA hit-man. Maybe Barris wanted to suggest by this narrative sleight-of-hand that what he’d done to the broadcasting medium was as dastardly as what US covert operations had done to American society as a whole during the Nixon years, or to send up once again the tendency of people to fantasize about their own talents which he had so often mined in his TV projects; more likely, though, he was just goofing off, and enjoyed it when some people were obtuse enough to believe his claims. In any event, Kaufman has taken the double-life scenario that Barris invented and run with it, building his script on the same sort of dichotomy that’s been central to all his films (whether it’s the merging of personalities in “Malkovich,” the nature-or-nurture clash of “Human Nature” or the doubling-and-overlapping of “Adaptation”). Beginning with a shot of a naked, wacked-out Barris (Sam Rockwell) blankly watching television in a New York hotel room while his long-suffering girlfriend Penny (Drew Barrymore) beseeches him to open the door, the picture weaves a schizophrenic tale that, on the one hand, showily narrates Chuck’s more mundane existence–his adolescent sexual escapades, the chutzpah he demonstrated in worming his way into a job at NBC, his stint on “American Bandstand” (along with success in writing a hit tune), his cutesy meeting with the spacey Penny, and his success as a producer–with an outrageous story involving his supposed “other life” as a government operative, recruited by stern, weird Jim Byrd (Clooney) to use his TV life as a cover to undertake officially-sponsored assassinations. Intercutting episodes from the two sides of Barris’ “life,” the film works its way to a last act in which both are falling apart–on the one hand, his broadcasting empire is crumbling, and on the other he finds himself targeted by the KGB and not knowing whom to trust.

In transferring this Barris-Kaufman concoction onto the screen, Clooney makes use of much that he’s learned from his work with other directors. He’s adopted a very stylized approach, with lots of striking compositions and unusual camera moves, and has assembled a capable behind-the- scenes team: James O. Bissell’s production design, Isabelle Guay’s art direction and Newton Thomas Sigel’s cinematography are all carefully calibrated to achieve maximum effect. He further inserts interview moments with a number of Barris’ old associates (Dick Clark, Jaye P. Morgan, and others) to lend a phony sense of “reality” to the proceedings (a tactic reminiscent of what Woody Allen did, though to much greater effect, in “Zelig”). But the often exquisite technical aspects of the picture aren’t equaled by the more human side of things. The performances are uneven. Rockwell is one of those unfortunate actors who’s had a succession of “breakthrough” roles, none of which have actually broken through to stardom; this is another of them. (There’s hope, though: the same affliction beset Dennis Quaid, and with “The Rookie” and “Far from Heaven” this year, he seems finally to have gotten over the hump.) Rockwell throws himself completely into the role of Barris, and though he’s really too tall and good-looking for it, he gets by; unfortunately, there’s too much of the caricature in Kaufman’s depiction, and it handicaps the actor. (Too much nudity, too: perhaps after “Solaris” Clooney wanted to impose the derriere shot on someone else, but the repetition of it here is frequent enough to become a motif.) Barrymore seems a trifle at sea as Penny (though Penny probably was, too), and Clooney does another of his darkly comic supporting turns as Byrd (though he was more amusing in “Welcome to Collinwood”–as was Rockwell, actually). Rutger Hauer shows up to good effect as a drunkenly over-the-hill agent, and Maggie Gyllenhaal is fine as well, but Julia Roberts comes off poorly as a femme fatale agent with whom Barris supposedly gets involved; their last scene together is a real clunker–a send-up that never takes off. Two other pals of the Soderbergh-Clooney pack, Brad Pitt and Matt Damon, show up for a “Dating Game” cameo that, given the fact it’s a pretty obvious joke, is mercifully brief.

As for Kaufman, his script for “Being John Malkovich” remains a brilliant flight of fancy, but more and more it seems to have been a fluke. “Human Nature,” “Adaptation” and now “Confessions” suggest that he’s mostly an overreacher, the screenwriting equivalent of a freshman philosophy student dying to show off his erudition but whose garbled disquisitions are much too ostentatiously clever for their own good.

LOVE LIZA

C+

Grief and gasoline are the essential elements in Todd Louiso’s debut feature, a heartfelt misfire about a man traumatized by the suicide of his wife. Dumpy, dweebish Wilson Joel (Philip Seymour Hoffman) is a computer geek whose devastation following the sudden, unexplained death of his beloved Liza puts him into a psychological tailspin that costs him his job as a website designer; even his sympathetic mother-in-law Mary Ann (Kathy Bates) proves unable to help. In his descent Wilson falls into two related obsessions. One is remote-controlled model airplanes, an interest which takes hold of him when he goes off on an aimless journey that eventually links him up with Denny (Jack Kehler), an oddball neighbor who’s also an enthusiast. The other is–believe it or not–an addiction to sniffing gas, which ultimately consumes him, destroys all chance for him to retrieve his career and undermines his relationship with Mary Ann. A further source of strain is the fact that Wilson has found a sealed suicide note from Liza which, to her mother’s distress, he’s unable to open. The dramatic assumption is that learning its contents will finally give him catharsis and closure.

The script by Gordy Hoffman, the star’s brother, is not so much a narrative as an episodic character study. The strength of this approach is that the picture is unpredictable; the choices Wilson makes are so far out of left field that it’s impossible to foresee the twists. The weakness, on the other hand, is that the psychological journey he takes seems arbitrary and almost perversely quirky. Individual moments are certainly fascinating, and the overall effect isn’t without interest, but as a whole the piece comes across as rather precious and haphazard.

One element of it, however, is totally extraordinary, and that’s Hoffman’s amazing performance. He’s always been a superlative actor, but he really outdoes himself here, drawing an astonishingly convincing portrait of a man at the absolute end of his emotional rope. What the script leaves largely unspoken, he creates virtually from scratch, expressing a level of despair so complete and so persuasive that it’s impossible to take your eyes off him; it’s a totally fearless turn in which Hoffman exposes himself so fully–both emotionally and physically–that the result is wrenching. None of the other cast members approach him. Bates is sound, but except for a single instance in which her anger at the loss of her daughter suddenly flares, her work is more solid than imaginative. Kehler’s eccentricity seems too broad, and Stephen Tobolowsky is overly unctuous as a prospective employer who’s curiously supportive of Wilson.

On the technical side, “Love Liza” is adequate, though the gritty appearance of Lisa Rinzler’s cinematography gets somewhat tiresome and the depiction of Wilson’s more fanciful flights is a trifle pedestrian. In the final analysis the film offers a journey that’s too random and inconclusive to be compelling, but which Hoffman’s brilliance almost makes worth taking.