All posts by One Guys Opinion

Dr. Frank Swietek is Associate Professor of History at the University of Dallas, where he is regarded as a particularly tough grader. He has been the film critic of the University News since 1988, and has discussed movies on air at KRLD-AM (Dallas) and KOMO-AM (Seattle). He is also the Founding President of the Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics' Association, a group of print and broadcast journalists covering film in the Metroplex area, and was a charter member of the Society of Texas Film Critics. Dr. Swietek is a member of the Online Film Critics Society (OFCS). He was instrumental in the creation of the Lone Star Awards, which, through the efforts of the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Film Commission, give recognition annually to the best feature films and television programs produced in Texas.

PREDESTINATION

A cerebral sci-fi time-travel puzzler that proves consistently engrossing and, for all its contrivance and complication, satisfying, “Predestination” represents a considerable success for its fraternal writing-directing team of Peter and Michael Spierig and star Ethan Hawke, whose willingness to undertake unusual projects like his films with them and Richard Linklater have made him one of the more interesting American actors around. But it’s a special triumph for Sarah Snook, a little-known Australian actress whose turn should do for her career what Edward Norton’s curiously similar one in “Primal Fear” did for his.

The Spierigs and Hawke, of course, worked together before in “Daybreakers,” a 2010 vampire movie that, despite some twists, didn’t transcend the limitations of what was already a tired genre. While time-travel isn’t exactly a new concept, and even the idea of a time-travelling cop has been around before (it wasn’t even fresh when Jean-Claude Van Damme used it twenty years ago), the Spierigs, working from a 1960 short story titled “ –All You Zombies— “ by Robert A. Heinlein, have been able not only to construct a labyrinthine tale that leads (or rather jumps) from one surprise to another but to weave them all together into what proves a goofily plausible whole. And they direct their script in a style that recalls early Cronenberg in its mixture of matter-of-factness in the face of absurdity with a sort of hallucinatory queasiness. This is a film that doesn’t pound you with sledgehammer point-making, but lures you deeper and deeper into its ever-weirder web, pulling the rug out from under you repeatedly but leaving you happy to go along with the jolt and move on to the next level.

Revealing too much about the plot would be unpardonable, but it ruins nothing to say that much of it revolves around a terrorist known as the “Fizzle Bomber” blowing up sites in New York City during the 1970s. The first scene shows a man in a trenchcoat trying to stop the villain from setting his latest device in motion, but suffering terrible effects from the explosion when he fails. A shadowy figure, however, assists him to reach a device that transports him to a hospital where his face is reconstructed into that of Hawke, and he’s identified as a Temporal Agent who travels through time retrieving clues about the terrorist that might allow him to be caught. Before long he’s healed and is back on the job, working as a bartender in a NYC dive.

There he encounters a strange-looking, bad-tempered customer (Snook) who identifies himself as the writer of confessional stories that travel under the byline of “the Unmarried Mother.” During a long conversation, the fellow pours out his life story—which begins with his childhood not only as an orphan but as a girl. Told in elaborate flashbacks, the tale involves seduction, pregnancy, a kidnapping and gender transformation—as well as a stint as a recruit in a company looking for exceptionally talented women to serve the needs of astronauts in space, a prospect presented to her by a quietly authoritative character called Mr. Robertson (Noah Taylor). After hearing the bizarre recounting, The Agent offers Mother a chance to confront the man who ruined his life—and even to kill him.

Up to this point “Predestination” is odd but fascinating; from it, the picture becomes odder and even more fascinating. It wouldn’t be fair to disclose the direction it takes, or the shifts that follow; and while one may have doubts about how it winds up, precisely what those doubts are should be kept to oneself, at least until you’re debating them with somebody else who’s also seen the movie. Suffice it to say that the rules you’ve probably been told are essential to the very notion of time travel don’t necessarily apply here. And though this movie might change those rules, it plays pretty fair by the new set.

Whatever reservations one might harbor about how the narrative is worked out, in any event, it’s well-nigh impossible to have any about the amazing quality of Snook’s performance, which not only rescues a character that might have become little more than a joke but gives it emotional heft. Hawke supports her with a turn that’s mostly straightforward but intense when it needs to be, while Taylor coolly embodies the ultra-capable company man who recognizes potential—and danger—when he sees it. The rest of the cast handle their roles capably. And the behind-the-camera crew do very effective work on what was clearly a modest budget, from Matthew Putland’s production design and Janie Parker’s art direction to the sets designed by James Parker and decorated by Vanessa Cerne and Wendy Cork’s costumes. Ben Nott contributes elegantly unfussy camerawork and Matt Villa subtly paced editing, while Peter Spireig’s score is nicely understated. Nor should one overlook the outstanding contribution of makeup designer Steve Boyle.

“Predestination” may not explore very successfully the deeper issues about the human condition that it wants to touches on. But it works astonishingly well as an extended “Twilight Zone” tale told with consummate skill.

MR. TURNER

As he did back in 1999 with “Topsy-Turvy,” his film about the making of “The Mikado,” writer-director Mike Leigh has applied his idiosyncratic creative process—combining long bouts of research-based improvisation with eventual condensation—to a historical subject, in this case the last twenty-five years in the life of the great English landscape artist J. M. W. Turner. Once again the result is extraordinarily perceptive, and while it’s inevitably less immediately engaging than the story of how a Gilbert and Sullivan masterpiece came to exist, it’s no less revelatory.

The film is grounded not only in the writer-director’s concern for detail—an obsession clearly shared by production designer Suzie Davies, art director Dan Taylor, set decorator Charlotte Watts and costume designer Jacqueline Durran—but in the work of Dick Pope and Timothy Spall. The former’s cinematography doesn’t try to mimic the style of Turner’s proto-impressionist paintings, but it’s remarkable in its own way, capturing the look of England in the second quarter of the nineteenth century with uncanny verisimilitude. He and Leigh don’t elect to focus overmuch on Turner’s canvases; instead they recreate what the artist would have seen and what excited his imagination, and show the reaction to his work in the eyes of others, like the young John Ruskin (Joshua McGuire), who remained a defender even as Turner moved toward a level of hazy abstraction that puzzled and antagonized both the painter’s colleagues and the public at large—a hostility dramatized well in the film’s later stages.

It’s a reaction that is reflected beautifully in Spall’s mesmerizing performance as a gruff, charmless man whose obsession to express an inner vision took absolute precedence over any consideration of popular taste or social graces. In Leigh’s film he appears, around 1826, already fully formed—a rumpled bear of a man tramping about England—and the continent—in search of scenes that pique his interest. Returning home to London after a trip to Belgium, he greets his elderly father William (Paul Jesson) and Hannah (Dorothy Atkinson), the sad-faced housekeeper who also serves his manly needs without murmur, with as much warmth as he seems able to muster—which is not much—before lumbering into his studio to resume work by furiously attacking a canvas. He’s no more agreeable when he bursts into the Royal Academy in bulldog fashion, grunting dismissively at the pieces by other artists, including the decorous John Constable (James Fleet). When Benjamin Haydon (Martin Savage), a painter of biblical scenes who’s fallen on hard times, beseeches him for help, he offers it only grudgingly. And when his erstwhile mistress Sarah Danby (Ruth Sheen) makes an unannounced visit with the two daughters Turner refuses to acknowledge, one already with child herself, Turner treats them all unfeelingly.

And yet as everyone already knows from his paintings, this is no brute. When spending time at the estate of a patron, Turner can control himself, even become communicative. He’s moved by another guest’s piano playing, even going so far as to attempt to croak out a Purcell aria from “Dido and Aeneas” in time to her keyboard rendition (though she does have to correct some of the words). He shows fascination with the scientific inquiries of his friend Mary Somerville (Lesley Manville), and with the new technique of photography when he sits for a daguerreotype in the shop of John Mayall (Leo Bill) and is enthusiastic over the result, though he expresses thanks that at least it doesn’t involve colors.

Most revealing, however, is the friendship he develops with the Booths, Sarah (Marion Bailey) and her sea-captain second husband (Karl Johnson) when he takes a room with them under an assumed name while visiting the seaside town of Margate in search for new vistas to paint. After Mr. Booth’s death, Turner and Sarah grow ever closer, and he spends a good deal of time in her home, eventually even dying there.

Spall conveys all the aspects of Turner’s complicated character in a formidable performance that presents the artist both as a virtual force of nature and as an intensely driven and troubled man. The rest of the cast work in his shadow, just as those around Turner did in real life, but one must especially single out Atkinson, who brings enormous poignancy to the stooped, submissive Hannah, and Bailey, whose canny performance suggests the homely presence that apparently served as balm to the painter’s wounded spirit in his last years.

But if “Mr. Turner” is largely Spall’s and, through him, Turner’s show, it’s also Leigh’s, cementing his position as an artist who uses a unique method to bring to vivid life stories—whether jauntily humorous or deadly earnest, whether of the nineteenth, twentieth or twenty-first century—that carry the ring of emotional truth. This is one of the finest films about an artist ever made, fashioned by a filmmaker who’s a notable artist himself.